亚太地区入境旅游增长6%

        亚太旅游协会(PATA)今日发布的统计数据显示,2011年8月,亚太地区目的地的国际入境游客人数较去年同期增长6%。

        今年1-8月间,尽管欧洲和北美遭遇经济动荡,亚太地区1的国际入境旅游仍保持平稳增长态势。其中,南亚凭借14%的同比增长率领跑亚太地区,东南亚位居次席(12%),东北亚和太平洋地区紧随其后(分别增长4%和1%)。

        东南亚地区8月的入境接待量同比增长15%,较7月的11%有所上升。其中,泰国(35%)、越南(29%)、柬埔寨(21%)、新加坡(18%)和菲律宾(11%)的增幅均超过7月,而缅甸和印尼却逊于7月水平。总体而言,东南亚地区的入境旅游保持良性增长。

        8月间,南亚地区的入境旅游增速位列第二。除印度外,该次区域所属各目的地均呈现双位数增长。印度的入境游客人数平稳增长5%,入境接待量抢眼。较去年同期增加2万人次。

        8月,东北亚地区接待入境游客超过2000万人次,同比增长4%,创单月接待量新高,尽管中国大陆入境游客人数较去年同期微弱回落1%,日本受地震及其次生灾害拖累,入境数据同比骤降32%。值得注意的是,过去几年中东北亚目的地入境旅游市场份额的变化趋势,即香港特别行政区、韩国和中国台湾在持续吸纳中国大陆和日本流失的份额。

        继三个月的持续萎缩后,8月间,太平洋地区的入境旅游出现了零增长。其中,澳大利亚和新西兰的入境接待量有所增加(3%和5%),而新喀里多尼亚和帕劳分别 激增53%和36%。夏威夷(-4%)和北马里亚纳(-12%)则出现了不同程度的下滑。

        PATA代理首席执行官高德伟(Bill Calderwood)指出:“亚太地区的国际入境旅游继续保持相对强劲的增长态势。很多目的地都超越了6%的地区增长率,也有少数目的地正在应对萎缩的入境市场。”

 

1亚太地区包括以下次区域:

东北亚包括中国大陆、中国台湾、香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区、日本、韩国以及蒙古

东南亚地区包括柬埔寨、印度尼西亚、老挝、马来西亚、缅甸、菲律宾、新加坡、泰国以及越南

南亚包括不丹、印度、马尔代夫、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦以及斯里兰卡

太平洋地区包括澳大利亚、库克群岛、斐济、基里巴斯、马绍尔群岛、新喀里多尼亚、新西兰、纽埃、北马里亚纳、帕劳、巴布亚新几内亚、萨摩亚、大溪地、汤加、图瓦卢以及瓦努阿图。

 

上述数据为初步结果,缺失数据采用预估值。除非另行注明,上述增长率及增幅均为年度同比数据。

 

更多市场分析和趋势预测,访问http://www.pata.org/sub-regional-trends-2011/


PATA北京办事处

电话:+ 86 (0)10 6500 1397

传真:+ 86 (0)10 6500 1497

电子邮箱:china@patachina.org

网站:www.pata.orgwww.patachina.org

微博:http://weibo.com/patachina

 

关于PATA

        作为一个会员机构,亚太旅游协会(PATA)对本地区旅行及旅游业的尽责发展持续发挥着促进作用。借助与官方及民间旅游机构的伙伴关系,PATA不断推动往来于亚太地区及区域内旅行及旅游业的可持续增长、以及价值和品质的提升。

        PATA提供的指导和专业咨询服务兼顾个人与群体,包括80个国家和地区的政府旅游机构、省市一级旅游部门、近50个国际航空公司、机场和邮轮公司以及数百家旅游企业。此外,还有数千名旅游专业人士分属于遍布世界的将近40个PATA分会。

        PATA 战略情报中心提供无可比拟的数据和透彻分析,包括对亚太地区出、入境旅游的统计、分析和预测,以及有关旅游市场战略的深度报告。

        PATA是一个非盈利组织。欲知详情,请访问www.patachina.org

This entry was posted in 新闻, 新闻聚焦, 最新要闻. Bookmark the permalink.

70 Responses to 亚太地区入境旅游增长6%

  1. the internet says:

    Have you given any kind of consideration at all with translating your blog in to Chinese? I know a couple of of translaters here which might help you do it for no cost if you wanna make contact with me personally.

  2. Just to let you know your webpage appears a little bit strange on Safari on my laptop using Linux .

  3. Is it okay to insert part of this in my web site if perhaps I publish a reference to this webpage?

  4. camps tennis says:

    This is a fantastic web site, could you be interested in doing an interview regarding just how you produced it? If so e-mail me personally!

  5. Good Stuff, do you have a flickr account?

  6. Just discovered this site thru Bing, what a pleasant surprise!

  7. Wanted to drop a remark and let you know your Rss feed isnt functioning today. I tried including it to my Bing reader account and got nothing.

  8. Fantastic Stuff, do you have a facebook profile?

  9. save on says:

    Whilst I genuinely like this post, I believe there was an punctuational error near to the finish of the third section.

  10. Wow! This blog site is awesome! How can I make it look this good !?

  11. How come you do not have your website viewable in wap format? Can not view anything in my netbook.

  12. Just discovered this blog through Bing, what a pleasant surprise!

  13. Im getting a teeny issue. I cant get my reader to pick-up your rss feed, Im using yahoo reader by the way.

  14. Im getting a browser error, is anyone else?

  15. A cool blog post right there mate . Cheers for posting !

  16. Do youve a spam issue on this internet site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; weve created some good techniques and we are searching to trade options with other people, be certain to shoot me an e-mail if planning to pursue.

  17. Just discovered this site thru Yahoo, what a way to brighten up my year!

  18. Is it okay to put a portion of this on my personal blog if perhaps I post a reference to this site?

  19. I appreciate your wordpress format, where did you get a hold of it?

  20. I was curious about if you ever thought of adjusting the layout of your site? Its well written; I enjoy what you have got to state. But maybe you could add a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. You have got a great deal of wording for only having one or two graphics. Maybe you could space it out better?